I was at a party the other day and someone asked me what i did, and i told them, and they were like cool, tell my friend. And then i told the friend, and they told me that their finger hurt, could i help? And i said maybe but thats not really my work. but i can try, and I started working on them, and then another friend was like why are you touching my friend, who do you think you are? and then they were like do you think you can help this guy with is messed up ankle, (enter massive black doctor) to which i said probably, to which their snickering smirks began to change. So the spotlight was shining on me, and i am not use to the spotlight, and of course this little bitchy heckler, continued poking me.
essentially she was all " i dont believe in your work" where did you go to school, how long was your training, snicker snicker, i think its full of shit, you are a moron. And i am just like jesus its not like i even asked to do this, who the fuck is this bitch? Does she have any friends, should i even engage her in conversation? How do intelligent people respond when fox retards are asking them inane questions?
So i told her: Well i havent told you what i do, so i dont see how you can disagree with what i do as you have no understanding of it, and what i do requires no belief, i improve the mobility of joints, through manual manipulation. no belief required. and she continued, and i just developed a non interact policy.
i jhave been asking myself lately how do you deal with total morons who just enjoy fighting and trying to destroy you, like the fox news team, with ron paul. Watch this video actually in minute 6, when Gulliani just starts being a total moron and tries to crucify, ron paul. I mean how do you respond? What would you do?
I realized that the hecklers father was a yoga teacher, and they didnt get along. And i realized that i could choose to hold up a mirror to her ridulousness, and get psychoanalytical on her ass exposing her whole attack on me, as some unconcscious relationship with her father that she is trying to work out, and perhaps reccomend an analyst.
If i did that what would happen? If i were to "win" what would winning look like? She would cry, or get irate, or perhaps just really uncomfortable. What would be the political blowback from such a manuever? How might her friends respond to such a humiliation? How would that affect the vibe of the party? hmmm?
So in a party setting i want to maintain civility and political neutrality / affinity with all of their potential allies. So if i do have a truth laser that will shine light on some hideous psychotic tendency of them, its probably not very nice to do this in a public setting, especially because i was the spotlight of the whole room was on me. I was actually treating a doctor's foot who had plantar fasciatus before a skeptical crowd. I wasnt sure if i could do it, and the whole party stopped and was watching me plow throw this doctors foot. so i just gave her one comment, then returned my attention to the task at hand.
I am thinking of adopting a non debate policy. So something like this. It seems that you would like to have a verbal interaction with me. I appreciate your attention, but have adopted a non debate policy. You see we can have an interaction where you take one side, and i take another, and we both try to destroy one another, and there is a winner and there is a loser. this is what i call a debate. Perhaps this is how you like to interact. I admit it does sound steamy, and passionate, which i can understand how one could enjoy, however while, I recognize this as an established protocol, unfortunately I no longer support interactivity on that particular platform. If you would like to discuss or further an idea of mine, or share an idea of yours which is seemingly in contrast to mine, perhaps we can discuss a way of integrating our relative experiences.
anyway, this new protocol is still in beta developement. and am playing around with the finer points of this new doctrine, please give feedback.
Anyway i endedd up substantially altering the doctors foot... he came in limping and went out walking. 50 business cards were circulated. And todd was victorious.
Yea!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
very insightful, to me it's as if the debaters don't hear each other because they are too focused on succeeding or proving the other person wrong. If this is the focus of the conversation, it is almost pointless and neither person can truly succeed the argument. But I think you found the loophole and you cured the doctor's foot, today was a good day yeah :)
I like this policy as well. Gratz on the added business too! :) Lose/Win and Win/Lose...still someone loses.
I personally prefer Win/Win, and with a debaters, hecklers they don't seem to know the concept or care.
Post a Comment